<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Galatians vs. the Gospel of Judas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archshrk.com/2006/04/galatians-vs-the-gospel-of-judas/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archshrk.com/2006/04/galatians-vs-the-gospel-of-judas</link>
	<description>World's Bestest SEO</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: archshrk</title>
		<link>http://archshrk.com/2006/04/galatians-vs-the-gospel-of-judas#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>archshrk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archshrk.com/?p=200#comment-400</guid>
		<description>Funny that the RCC would not teach more from Luther's works...
Unfortunately, Galatians and Romans is the only commentary that I know of but he has writen plenty of great stuff in general (http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/wittenberg-luther.html#comment).  The commentary itself is public domain so many websites have it available online but there is something nice about holding a book in your hands rather than staring at pixels all day.  The Crossway Classic Commentaries edition I listed is abridged and stylistically adapted for today's readers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that the RCC would not teach more from Luther&#8217;s works&#8230;<br />
Unfortunately, Galatians and Romans is the only commentary that I know of but he has writen plenty of great stuff in general (http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/wittenberg-luther.html#comment).  The commentary itself is public domain so many websites have it available online but there is something nice about holding a book in your hands rather than staring at pixels all day.  The Crossway Classic Commentaries edition I listed is abridged and stylistically adapted for today&#8217;s readers</p>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://archshrk.com/wp-content/plugins/tippy/dom_tooltip.css" media="screen" /><script type="text/javascript" src="http://archshrk.com/wp-content/plugins/tippy/dom_tooltip.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radioactive Jam</title>
		<link>http://archshrk.com/2006/04/galatians-vs-the-gospel-of-judas#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Radioactive Jam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archshrk.com/?p=200#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Think I might get a copy of this commentary, sounds good. Did Luther write commentaries for other books as well? I feel almost ignorant where he's concerned; during my twelve years of Roman Catholic education his writings were curiously neglected. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think I might get a copy of this commentary, sounds good. Did Luther write commentaries for other books as well? I feel almost ignorant where he&#8217;s concerned; during my twelve years of Roman Catholic education his writings were curiously neglected. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
